viatoll 
ENEN
BIP 

ODDZIAŁY:

GDDKiA Oddział Gdańsk Oddział Olsztyn Oddział Białystok Oddział Warszawa Oddział Lublin Oddział Bydgoszcz Oddział Poznań Oddział Szczecin Oddział Zielona Góra Oddział Łódź Oddział Wrocław Oddział Opole Oddział Katowice Oddział Kraków Oddział Kielce Oddział Rzeszów Oddział Szczecin Oddział Gdańsk Oddział Olsztyn Oddział Białystok Oddział Zielona Góra Oddział Poznań Oddział Bydgoszcz Oddział Warszawa Oddział Wrocław Oddział Łódź Oddział Kielce Oddział Lublin Oddział Opole Oddział Katowice Oddział Kraków Oddział Rzeszów

Oddział w Bydgoszczy
ul. Fordońska 6
85-085 Bydgoszcz

tel. centr. 52 323 45 00
fax 52 323 45 04
NIP 554-22-52-485

e-mail: sekretariat_byd@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Gdańsku
ul. Subisława 5
80-354 Gdańsk

tel. centr. 58 511 24 00
fax 58 511 24 05
NIP 584-24-56-536

e-mail: sekretariat_gdansk@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Białystoku
ul. Zwycięstwa 2
15-703 Białystok

tel. centr. 85 664 58 00
fax 85 651 37 83
NIP 542-27-52-914

e-mail: sekretariat_bialystok@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Katowicach
ul. Myśliwska 5
40-017 Katowice

tel. centr. 32 258 62 81
fax 32 259 87 10
NIP 954-24-02-923

e-mail: kat_sekretariat@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Kielcach
ul. Paderewskiego 43/45
25-950 Kielce

tel. 41 34 03 900, 41 345 74 31
fax 41 366 48 04
NIP 657-03-86-703

e-mail: sekretariat_kielce@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Krakowie
ul. Mogilska 25
31-542 Kraków

tel. centr. 12 417 25 00
fax 12 411 01 18
NIP 675-12-72-475

e-mail: sekretariat_krakow@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Lublinie
ul. Ogrodowa 21
20-075 Lublin

tel. 81 532 70 61
fax 81 743 71 68
NIP 712-24-27-134

e-mail: sekretariat_lublin@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Łodzi
ul. Irysowa 2
91-857 Łódź

tel. centr. 42 233 96 00
fax 42 233 96 08
NIP 725-17-13-273

e-mail: sekretariat_lodz@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Olsztynie
ul. Warszawska 89
10-083 Olsztyn

tel. centr. 89 521 28 00
fax 89 527 23 07
NIP 739-32-79-711

e-mail: sekretariat_olsztyn@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Opolu
ul. Niedziałkowskiego 6
45-085 Opole

tel. centr. 77 401 63 00
fax 77 454 44 68
NIP 754-00-03-773

e-mail: sekretariat_opole@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Poznaniu
ul. Siemiradzkiego 5a
60-763 Poznań

tel. centr. 61 866 88 21
fax 61 864 63 69
NIP 779-21-73-262

e-mail: sekretariat_poznan@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Rzeszowie
ul. Legionów 20
35-959 Rzeszów

tel. centr. 17 853 40 71 do 74
fax 17 853 64 84
NIP 813-11-06-223

e-mail: sekretariat_rzeszow@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Szczecinie
Al. Bohaterów Warszawy 33
70-340 Szczecin

tel. centr. 91 432 53 00
fax 91 484 39 97
NIP 852-23-53-687

e-mail: sekretariat_szczecin@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Warszawie
ul. Mińska 25
03-808 Warszawa

tel. centr. 22 209 25 00
fax 22 698 60 45
NIP 113-20-97-244

e-mail: sekretariat_warszawa@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Wrocławiu
ul. Powstańców Śląskich 186
53-139 Wrocław

tel. centr. 71 334 73 00
fax 71 367 17 69
NIP 899-24-41-331

e-mail: sekretariat.wroclaw@gddkia.gov.pl

Oddział w Zielonej Górze
ul. Boh. Westerplatte 31
65-950 Zielona Góra

tel. centr. 68 327 10 68
fax 68 325 34 68
NIP 929-01-16-588

e-mail: sekretariat_zga@gddkia.gov.pl

GDDKiA WebsiteGDDKiAArchive 2012

Eurovia – 99 cracks covered with 3 lies

14-03-2012

With regard to the Wednesday’s statement of the Eurovia company, incorporated into the Vinci group, which is the polemic with the facts determined in the course of the detailed laboratory tests, the General Directorate for National Roads and Motorways informs:

1. The first lie: The A2 has cracks because of taking too hard asphalt which cracks in the Polish climate.

The cause of appearing of the crevices and cracks, among others, on the constructed by the Eurovia company section A of the A2 motorway from Stryków to Konotopa, is not the defective technology of the high modulus asphalt concrete, what was raised by the contractor in the letter from 2011, but the lack of the proper protection of the subsequent elements of the road construction or the mechanical damages to the route by the saw cuts. This is an evident construction malpractice. The so-called low temperature cracks, ie. those that appear when the construction cracks in the frost due to the too hard asphalt, did not appear – and this is what Eurovia wrote about in the spring of 2011. See the pictures of the A2 surface damaged with saw in the section A:

picture no. 1, picture no. 2picture no. 3

 

2. The second lie: there have never been any objections to the quality of the roads built by Eurovia

See the official example documents from different contracts realized by Eurovia, where one can find the proofs for the objections of the GDDKiA technologists as to the quality of the work of that contractor, the orders to do repairs issued by the Contract Engineer and the summary of the results of the monitoring of the quality of works for 2011 – the results which do not comply with the requirements are marked with red colour;

see the documents:

document no. 1, document no. 2, document no. 3, document no. 4

 

3. The third lie: the warnings from the Eurovia letter of 2011 were confirmed

In relation to the Eurovia letter of March 2011 GDDKiA together with the Road and Bridge Research Institute organized in May 2011 the special seminar dedicated to the arguments of the contractor on the use of the technology improper for the Polish weather conditions. The RBRI, which for more than 10 years has been working on the development of the proper technology for the asphalt roads for Poland, rejected all of the Eurovia arguments. Rejected was also the argument, that the adapted method to use the surface of the High Stiffness Modulus – that is those on which the ruts do not appear – is god for France, but not for Poland, where bigger decreases of temperatures occur. That is why the RBRI adjusting the technology to our country conditions changed the used in France very hard asphalt to the softer one, on which in our weather the cracks and ruts do not appear. See the documents from the seminar:

 

The above mentioned events do not change the fact that Eurovia constructed in Poland for example the section of the S7 road from Elbląg to Pasłęk, and even though the technological irregularities of different types occurred, they have been fixed by the contractor, the road is now in operation and there are no problems on the road so far. Moreover, the fact shall be stressed that despite the deficiencies noticed during the construction works, they were corrected by the contractor, and due to that there were no reasons so far to terminate the contract with Eurovia. Therefore there were no reasons not to consider this company’s offers in the further orders.